tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post6683706724013139644..comments2024-02-25T05:24:24.948-05:00Comments on Beyond Easy: Stuck in my craw: woketweetsPatrick Rhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02410016566636603639noreply@blogger.comBlogger46125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-50746281178074449792017-03-15T02:37:41.136-04:002017-03-15T02:37:41.136-04:00If you want numbers, look at public crime statisti...If you want numbers, look at public crime statistics sorted by city. You'll see that all of them at the top are blue with the exception of a couple of oil boom towns in alaska and the dakotas, where they are literally hiring ex convicts to do the work.<br /><br />Your asking for sources is a mask behind which you hide the fact that you ignore the stats, and continually do. It's a ritual cleansing you do to yourself to absolve yourself of hte guilt you project onto anyone who disagrees.<br /><br />It is obvious the left is more violent. Russia and china killed an order of magnitude more peple than fascist. The communists in america will target you before they target the far right. They're targeting moderates as well. THE BLOG HOST complained about this. No wonder I'm afraid.<br /><br />Violence against communists would never be tolerated in america. The violence has a single direction. You have ideologically justified killing anyone further to the right than you.<br /><br />The left can't even build a website or functional healthcare system. The left can't even keep the water running in cities like detroit, which has regressed back to the pre-industrial era.<br /><br />No, I'm not afraid because I'm alone. I'm afraid for the same reason the chinese had reason to fear mao.<br /><br />Anyway, have a good day. I pray not too many innocents have to die, lose their health coverage, etc, to satisfy the pride of a petulant child who calls people who voted for obama "nazis."fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-91598977644603152712017-03-14T21:44:00.193-04:002017-03-14T21:44:00.193-04:00I was going to say that I find you disgusting, but...I was going to say that I find you disgusting, but examining my feelings I think that I actually pity you, genuinely. You are so alone. There are so few of you and the world that you want, free of the hated "Other" will never come to be. One day Trump's presidency will come to an end and your hopes for cleansing of the evils you perceive will cease and you'll go back to be reminded that you are the evil that needs to be cleansed. And even under Trump, you cannot publicly say these things without fear of retribution, without fear of the rest of the world making a caricature out of your punishment. So you are left to trawl the dark corners of the Internet, troll left-leaning blogs of people that you feel that you can condescend to and run your mouth of all the things you wish you were allowed to say from a podium. Look at you giving thanks at the end of your post as though it was an impassioned speech met with ovation as opposed to a poorly researched and punctuated, overly emotional rant that literally two people in the world are reading. It would be adorable if it wasn't rather sad and pathetic.<br /><br />So I'm going to do something nice for you: I'll allow you to have the last word. C'mon, it's ok to do your worst. Do say that I am a killer and an ignorant nobody. Do accuse me of fleeing your "logical" argumentation in defeat. Do feel like you have won a powerful debate and greatly furthered your cause on this world. I won't say a peep even if you make the most laughably outrageous claims that could be disproved with the most basic Google search. God knows that those are tempting to refute, but I'll steel myself. Enjoy.Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-75027729488818659862017-03-14T21:43:22.429-04:002017-03-14T21:43:22.429-04:00Damn, I hate when I am proven to be mistaken. In t...Damn, I hate when I am proven to be mistaken. In this case, it was a mistake to keep engaging you and giving you the benefit of doubt. I did offer you the opportunity to discuss this civilly. I asked you pointed questions to further the discussion, requested sources for your claims instead of outright trying to dismiss them and tried, overall, to be conciliatory in spite of your belligerent tone and the unfair assumptions and insults you make in every post.<br /><br />However, you don't have an argument. You don't have sources and there's no logic or facts behind your claims. You have now been reduced to parrot "they want to kill us", "violence against whites", "teaching to be killers" etc, all baseless claims that you have been unwilling and unable to support with evidence. And of course you are unable to find any because even other rightists would look at you like you are crazy when you say things like "they are teaching at schools to kill us".<br /><br />You are basically living a dark fantasy where the millions of men, women and children that belong to other races, cultures and political leanings are out to get you. Every single one of them. They are not minding their own business and pursuing their own happiness, no, they are exhaustively plotting how to kill you. You know this because there's like, a rap song that kind of says that and the other day someone punched a person who's basically a self-confessed nazi. Those two items give you all the evidence you need to jump to such conclusions the make up more facts and more connections that support your prejudiced beliefs. In an era when every decent person, regardless of party affiliation tells you that being a racist is bad, you have to come up with reasons to support your hatred, no matter how fantastical.<br /><br />Writing this I have come to a realisation, though. The kind of beliefs you and the few people in America hold resemble most closely those spouted by neo-nazis and white supremacists. Then all of a sudden, everything makes sense. Your paranoia, your fear of violence against you! We live in a world where it is ok to punch nazis! (which you obviously conflate with "white people.") And that frightens you. You want to be able to spout your hatred freely, without consequences and maybe hoped that a Trump presidency would be your time to shine, but it turns out that it is not. And it will never be. Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-4295231172473698782017-03-14T13:27:59.979-04:002017-03-14T13:27:59.979-04:00The Right hunts together, the Left hunts itself. S...The Right hunts together, the Left hunts itself. Sigh.Patrick Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02410016566636603639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-19811955128046777652017-03-14T11:43:59.970-04:002017-03-14T11:43:59.970-04:00killing white males is known as an "actionabl...killing white males is known as an "actionable" goal. The right was floundering for 30 years because even though all the things trump pointed out, such as the fact that white people were getting targeted for crime, were obvious, there was nothing 'actionable' because even mentioning something like that could get your fired from your job.<br /><br />for the last 30 years, killing white people in street crime has been actionable. It's VERY easy to understand how to do it and get the result you want: which is that white people die. If police retaliate, it's not very actionable.<br /><br />To that end, you might notice that what is 'actionable' is completely determined by who is in power. now that trump is in power, conservatives have freedom of speech, which they did not before. When obama was in power, democrats had freedom of violence.<br /><br />but this problem stretches back 80 years or even longer. remind me why JFK forced school integration at the barrel of a gun, but obama cannot even stop riots with the barrel of a gun. Oh, because obama had ZERO interest in making sure that the riots stopped."power comes from the barrel of a gun" I might remind you, is a saying from Mao.<br /><br />So, if you TELL people to commit violence, well, they very well might. It wasn't exactly 'bigoted' white evangelicals in boise idaho that made gangster rap ubiquitous. They advocated outlawing it, in fact.<br /><br />So shouldn't we blame white democrats, who advocated that gangster rap about raping women and shooting people, be free speech instead of obscenity?<br /><br />I guarantee you, boise, Idaho, is still quite a pleasant city to visit. Baltimore, you might want to avoid.<br /><br />America is MORE EQUAL TODAY than it ever has been in history. But strangely, now is when the loudest calls for violent reprisal against whites have been sounded.<br /><br />Confess you are racist, because we know you are racist already, so you might as well take responsibility!<br /><br />You sound like an evangelical during the KKK era. And that's not a coincidence. Liberalism is a fanatical folk religion which, instead of witches casting curses and disease on people, invisibly, racists 3k miles away in red places somehow cause crime in blue cities.<br /><br />Of course, you could look at who owns the labels publishing violent rap albums... No, it's probably the christian who says 'turn the other cheek' rather than NWO, who explicitly write lyrics about killing white people.<br /><br />Of course it was 'just a song.' Until today, when it became the explicit democratic party platform.<br /><br />Thanks.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-78346705913262747052017-03-14T08:45:51.695-04:002017-03-14T08:45:51.695-04:00note, it should saw lower correlation. the combin...note, it should saw lower correlation. the combined p values of all these factors is rated as basically nothing, to psychologists.<br /><br />You can't just invent a theory about how the brain works in your head and say "yup, that's exactly how it works."<br /><br />Stress, in fact, does not directly increase violence. IT shows in the numbers. But, IF, you stress someone and give them a target of violence, say, jews in germany or "white males" in california.... well then you might get a result.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-90009079526587308882017-03-14T08:43:19.144-04:002017-03-14T08:43:19.144-04:00Most cities became leftist as the result of immigr...Most cities became leftist as the result of immigration from the third world, note, everywhere in california, which was a solid red state from its inception, or migration within the country FROM blue states that failed, notes: current state of texas and colorado FROM california.<br /><br />You will note that california currently has one of the 'highest' levels of education. education, which you say, is supposed to cure the ills of violence and poverty. funny, as california becomes MORE educated, it becomes MORE violent. california also has one of the highest unemployment rates, so seemingly it doesn't improve the economy either. And as formerly safe midwestern/southern states like colorado, idaho, and texas, get MORE californians, they get LESS safe.<br /><br />Your solution doesn't work. Your solution is, in fact, CREATING the problem. and if you were to blame it on poverty instead: again, why are all of these problems not evidenced in chna, where everything is worse, but violence is less?<br /><br />Ah! China, and Japan, and Korea, and Singapore, and Taiwan, AND MOROCCO, for that matter, are not leftist. That's why. They don't ENCOURAGE riots, nor give people an 'education' that says if they don't like something, they should blame it on the people with middle class jobs, and kill them.<br /><br />I am not disavowing the link between nonasian minorities and violence. I am saying you 'education' system has trained them in neo-marxist rhetoric to encourage killing white people.<br /><br />3 days after hiroshima was bombed, they began rebuilding teh city, even though they were dying, starving, missing limbs, lacking medical care<br /><br />There were NOT riots in hiroshima OR nagasaki. Are you telling me the 'stress' of living in california on welfare is worse than hiroshima or nagasaki, post bomb? You throw together a cavalcade of stats, including stress, income, etc, and it STILL has a power correlation than raw statistics indicating race or whether it's a blue city or not. your entire conception of how to use inductive logic is flawed.<br /><br />Australia is moderately right wing. They've been repelling immigrants for 15 years now. Canada is pretty left wing, but unlike france, they have lower levels of immigration. france is not "improved" by their left wing policies. France has been getting steadily worse for 40 years straight. You'd know that if you spoke the language.<br /><br />fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-92074579150921715102017-03-13T20:44:23.313-04:002017-03-13T20:44:23.313-04:00Btw, Canada and Australia are some other countries...Btw, Canada and Australia are some other countries that have several "leftist" policies and have comparatively very little violence. France may be suffering of a problem caused by warring immigrants, but other than that its policies have greatly increased the quality of life of its inhabitants and once you take away the problem of the militant immigrants, there's very little urban violence. On the other hand, I could think of several right-wing country governments suffering of high indexes of violence, Italy and Colombia come to mind. Again, what I'm saying is even though that individual policies (left or right) may be the direct or indirect cause of violence, chalking a whole political leaning as THE cause for violence is not only facile and self-indulgent but also bound to be incorrect as we start looking at both more detailed data and more examples.<br /><br />There are other things you touch here and there, but as this post is long enough already, I'd like to focus on these topics for the time being, if you don't mind. Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-66378884669789919502017-03-13T20:44:05.869-04:002017-03-13T20:44:05.869-04:00Hmm, but you initially seemed to imply that /most/...Hmm, but you initially seemed to imply that /most/ cities are "blue", regardless of their state traditional affiliation (which is why I was initially confused about your argument). Here's the quote in question, for clarity's sake: "So when you look at cities, yes, they are almost exclusively blue, and all of them but a couple in alaska are filled with nonasian minorities. That's not a coincidence." Note that this quote also seems to imply a correlation between comparative percentages of nonwhites in cities with the core of your argument, higher violent crime in cities. Since your latter post seems to clarify a focus on the role of party policies over race, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now that you simply used an unfortunate combination of words.<br /><br />So, then what, now? First, I'd like to address the claim that "most cities" are blue. I'm going to take that as a fact for the sake of the argument as I'm unable to find any solid numbers on this (mostly because the word "cities" is a rather nebulous descriptor: what makes a city? raw population size? density of population per km2? I'd appreciate if you shared any sources on this to support your claim.) Nevertheless, I lean to believe your claim in principle. Why? Mostly because cities seem to have, in general, a more progressive level of education than more rural communities. People in cities are, again in general, better travelled and more conscious of issues outside their core communities at nation and world-wide level. They also have day-today contact with people from many different racial, cultural, religious and intellectual background, plus possess a better understanding of new technologies, especially those that regard human communication. Going by that, I'd indeed expect a left lean across the board.<br /><br />The issue, then, seems to rest in what we qualify as "left" policies? According to me left policies aim to increase the rights of individuals, especially those who have been marginalised and need increased representation to reach that which other groups of people have enjoyed for centuries. According to you, they are destructive policies that directly increase crime, impunity and unlawfulness. This is logically problematic in the most basic level: Why would anybody support those policies if they are as blatantly counterproductive as you suggest? I think I am going to ask you at this point to give me a specific example on how a leftist policy has directly and undeniably the effects that you describe.<br /><br />Moving on, you seem to keep repeating "violence against rightist" which needs to be condemned as so on. Are we speaking about Richard Spencer getting punched? You always speak in rather vague and nebulous terms in order to present your argument as an encompassing issue, but if we're talking about an incident in particular, I think it merits to be examined in detail to see if it truly can be said to represent a trend, rather than an isolated incident with extenuating factors.<br /><br />Next, you seem to dismiss outright the factors I present as associated with violence, but have no base for such dismissal. For example you almost laugh at the link I make between stress and violence when several studies exist linking anxiety to aggressiveness. True, not directly to violence but my point is that when you /combine/ all the factors that I mentioned (and sure, poor policing and the other things you mention *as well*) you get the violent outcome. It is a more realistic, nuanced and responsible way of looking at an issue than your "THIS and this alone is the cause of violence in cities". As an exercise in thought, any conclusion to which you can jump which outcome is to be able to hate a group of people for it (especially one that you were already predisposed against) must be examined critically as likely influenced by biased thinking.Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-20523015160003552402017-03-13T04:35:43.842-04:002017-03-13T04:35:43.842-04:00Around ten years ago I was in Argentina visiting a...Around ten years ago I was in Argentina visiting a dear friend and we found ourselves grabbing dinner with a professor who had been arrested and tortured by the Junta back in the late 70s.<br /><br />It was 2006 and the we were talking about how, having been expelled from mainstream political life after the debacle of 1968, the American left had taken refuge in academia and how that made the US left overly obsessed with narrative, optics, discourse to the detriment of actual political action. That's still true today. Go to "woke" Twitter and 90% is poli-sci seminar bullshit masquerading as "hot takes" on the issues of the day.<br /><br />And that is why, you see, the Right always wins in the end. Because be it in Argentina in the 1970s, when suit-wearing "liberals" (in the Euro sense) where more than happy with the gorillas doing their killing, or America in 2017, with #nevertrumps now begging Bannon for jobs, at the end of the day, as the professor said then... "The Right always goes hunting together." <br /><br />Ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04370367327523217644noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-40842819353355243232017-03-11T08:50:26.742-05:002017-03-11T08:50:26.742-05:00Note: nowhere in my posts did I say I would RATHER...Note: nowhere in my posts did I say I would RATHER live in a right wing government. I certainly don't want to live in a safe, but roundly awful and corrupt, China or Morocco.<br /><br />But there does seem to be a strong correlation between left wing governments, and sudden outbreaks of street violence, all the way up to civil war. It was AFTER the introduction of democracy in the arab spring that civil wars broke out, which ultimately led to ISIS forming.<br /><br />A balance might be nice. But most people on the left are too busy attacking absolutely everyone even slightly to the right of them, and then the blog author is busy saying "Hey, I'm a little to the right of you but don't attack ME, there's a guy over there who is even more right wing than me. Attack him! HE is guilty for racism, not me!"<br /><br />Gee, I wonder if this mindset is part of why people are attacking each other in the street.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-68511321057899005232017-03-11T08:45:05.195-05:002017-03-11T08:45:05.195-05:00The idea that racists in red states 2k miles away ...The idea that racists in red states 2k miles away project psychic mind waves that make minorities kill each other exclusively in blue states... is literally like blaming a witch from the next town over for your husband falling ill.<br /><br />There is a very local cause to all these blue cities. Notice I said local, and not someone you can easily scapegoat and attack with impunity.<br /><br />If you like the idea of mob justice coming from the new left, you should be very thrilled about the way the radical muslims in afghanistan stoned that woman to death for an imaginary crime. Islam is actually very egalitarian in many ways. No matter your race, everyone is equal under islam, and everyone has equal right to punish heathens, as you would see in the video clip above. The problem is in defining the scope of blasphemy, and who gets to define it. Unfortunately, in afghanistan, it's currently controlled by radical imams.<br /><br />Who controls who gets to be attacked in blasphemy in America? It SEEMS as if the democratic party gets to decide who can be freely attacked in the streets. You seem to agree, because you have advocated that people like me deserve to get attacked.<br /><br />Well then.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-29282682747655600592017-03-11T07:05:09.578-05:002017-03-11T07:05:09.578-05:00*sigh* I told myself I wouldn't engage with yo...*sigh* I told myself I wouldn't engage with you again but here's a last attempt, one more reckless reaching out to see if under the several layers of desperate need for validation that make you condescend to others, to presume that they are illiterate, unworldly and wilfully ignorant there's a human being.<br /><br />Look, the problem is not the numbers or much less arithmetic the problem is with the causation that you and people like you want to demonstrate based on weak correlations suggested by the numbers. <br /><br />So, cities are more violent than country towns or counties, ok. You take that little datum and then dig for another datum: Cities have a higher concentration of people of non-white races than country towns do. Then you go "ah-ha! found the clear, mathematical, undeniable cause!", jumping to a conclusion that you clearly find satisfactory while ignoring and dismissing other factors such as:<br /><br />-There's more density of population in cities. There are more people living close together than in towns, all the time.<br />-There's a higher percentage of unemployment due to jobs in cities being both more specialised and more automated. This leaves lots of people in enforced idleness.<br />-There's more stress. Lots more.<br />-There are 'undergrounds" of organised crime.<br />-There more class disparity but less distance between classes, meaning that people with low income get to resent the rich people they see rolling around in expensive cars while they are barely scrapping a meal a day.<br />-That class disparity mean that although the index of poverty may seem lower in cities than in the counties you speak of, poor communities in cities are actually much, much poorer than that.<br />-There's more corruption.<br />-There's more anonymity, both enforced and/or willing.<br /><br />In other words, of course that cities are more violent. They are bubbling cauldrons of stressed, sometimes angry people haphazardly divided in pockets of extreme income disparity. Racial diversity is a fact that is parallel to these issues, though it could be argued that the discrimination and marginalisation that non-white people have historically suffered and the consequent diminishment of opportunities to elevate oneself above one's circumstances have contributed to the problem. <br /><br />So the issue with what you are saying and the reason why you are being called a racist is not because we are trying to deny your numbers, but because we see the issue as multifaceted as it is. The fact that you take a reductive, facile correlation to boil down the issue of urban violence to is problematic to say the least. But when you seem not only comfortable but, in fact, boastful that your conclusion implies that non-white races are /inherently/ more violent or whatever other trait conducive to violence, then you are thinking and talking like a racist.<br /><br />Once you realise that there are only two paths: you either embrace your racism like other illustrious people inside your party such as Steve Bannon, Richard Spencer and Milo Yiannopulos have done, adhering to their belief that "whites have better souls" (something that Spencer has publicly said); or you realise that maybe it is possible to have a more nuanced version of your political beliefs that do not include considering a significant amount of your fellow Americans inherently subhuman and, as such, blameable of all the evils in our society.Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-57519228860993620642017-03-11T04:30:08.970-05:002017-03-11T04:30:08.970-05:00http://therightscoop.com/horrifying-video-of-afgha...http://therightscoop.com/horrifying-video-of-afghans-beating-to-death-and-burning-body-of-woman-accused-of-burning-koran/<br /><br />Don't worry. She probably deserved it. Anyone who says something racis... against the Quran deserves it. And she DEFINITELY said it. There's no doubt.<br /><br />Thank allah for mob intelligence.<br /><br />Arithmetic is evil.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-73834350283525686392017-03-11T04:20:22.503-05:002017-03-11T04:20:22.503-05:00I think people capable of middle school math are w...I think people capable of middle school math are witches. If they perform addition, and I can't count, they probably deserve to be burned alive at the stake. They deserved it, after all.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-87999617486570518652017-03-11T04:15:58.980-05:002017-03-11T04:15:58.980-05:00Clever.
I'm sure we can both agree on the met...Clever.<br /><br />I'm sure we can both agree on the methods by which science denial happens, as a phenomenon.<br /><br />But how did we get to the point of arithmetic denial? Because truly, crime reports are a census, rather than statistical extrapolation. It does not fall into the mathematical domain of statistics, though we call the figures statistics for simplicity's sake. They actually fall under the domain of arithmetic, at about what you might learn pre-geometry in middle school.<br /><br />I must concede you are right about one thing. Conservatives do tend to be mean and lack sympathy. On the other hand, what are liberals who disregard arithmetic as racist warlock magic?fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-30056586137658511852017-03-10T15:24:06.420-05:002017-03-10T15:24:06.420-05:00You're worse than a yippy chihuahua.You're worse than a yippy chihuahua.Patrick Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02410016566636603639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-92141430029305444492017-03-10T11:08:53.075-05:002017-03-10T11:08:53.075-05:00If you'd like to start "giving people the...If you'd like to start "giving people the benefit of the doubt" you might want to stop thinking of the people on team Trump as obnoxious brats with no guiding ideology or goals beyond throwing a hateful tantrum after getting their feelings hurt in college.Antonymhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05006679703845842937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-29565763492121747422017-03-10T07:55:49.315-05:002017-03-10T07:55:49.315-05:00I didn't collect those statistics. The local ...I didn't collect those statistics. The local police departments headed by democrats, such as in atlanta, collected the murder statistics as they zipped up the body bags.<br /><br />Being numerate in basic math doesn't make me racist. But being innumerate does make you stupid.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-11700091330675020452017-03-10T07:13:45.877-05:002017-03-10T07:13:45.877-05:00Dude, you have progressively shown yourself as an ...Dude, you have progressively shown yourself as an unabashed, outspoken racist, who uses racism as a pretend logical argument. And you must be also pretending not to know who Bannon or Richard Spencer are if you are trying to wash your hands clean of the blatant antisemitism in the darker corners of your party, Ivanka Trump's Jewishness-by-marriage notwithstanding. As I said above, there's no common ground for a discussion as every single one of your arguments is fabricated around excusing and justifying your racism. And you have the temerity of complaining about the threat of physical violence when you yourself spouse racial hatred? Get out of here.Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-12655238714175217752017-03-10T06:18:46.630-05:002017-03-10T06:18:46.630-05:00You're braindead. I never mentioned states on...You're braindead. I never mentioned states once. By zooming out to the level of states instead of focusing on cities, you are looking at a low resolution form of data with zero usage. Why not examine crime data based on time zone, genius?<br /><br />The fact of the matter is that NO STATE has a dramatically outsized murder rate. So examining STATES is stupid. Some cities though, have murder rates 100 times above the average, and thousands of time higher than other cities.<br /><br />So when you look at cities, yes, they are almost exclusively blue, and all of them but a couple in alaska are filled with nonasian minorities. <br /><br />That's not a coincidence. <br /><br />I bring plenty of facts. I doubt your bachelor's degree in underwater basket weaving prepares you for much in life. If you think trump supporters hate jews, when trump's DAUGHTER is jewish, you're an idiot. Muslims are the only ones with a vested interest in killing jews. Those are the people YOU like, idiot.<br /><br />I bashed him because he's whining that the liberal manaiacs that have unleashed are attacking him as irrationally as they're attacking anyone who isn't a full communist. I tend not to have sympathy for people who support violence, and complain only when it happens to be directed against themselves.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-19741563305908635202017-03-10T05:28:58.777-05:002017-03-10T05:28:58.777-05:00Dude you keep mentioning "facts" yet kee...Dude you keep mentioning "facts" yet keep bringing 0 to this discussion. Now we have moved to most violent cities? Alright. http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2016/10/01/most-dangerous-cities-america/91227778/ Hmm an even divide between blue and red states... could you be lying again? No, wait! The red states in this list must have black and Mexican people in them, so they don't count because according to you, your racism is based in /facts/. Not in weak correlations that only a mind intent in justifying an already existing bigoted bias could trace, but in "facts". And note that I have never tried to link poverty and crime (or deny the link). You were the one who brought up those two topics to posit that they are "blue state" traits. I merely showed you that that was incorrect without trying to add any commentary on it.<br /><br />Oh by the way, baby eating in China? Both the Interpool and the FBI looked into it. False. Stop this weak flailing. You accuse me of not knowing anything of the world and yet your only knowledge of it seems to come from stereotypes and morbid Internet stories. You throw blind, unnecessary accusations about my knowledge of languages, then think that you get to dismiss the languages I speak on your own principle. Nothing matters to you but the narrative you already have in your mind and nothing is going to stop you to try to overlay that fantasy on top of reality, so there's simply not enough common ground for a real argument. <br /><br />Also, the Berkeley riots were over a month ago, stop whining about "delicate" people on the right such as a confessed paedophile or a proud antisemite being "physically attacked". I don't see you complaining about all the vandalism and death threats that American Jew communities have been the target of more recently.<br /><br />So, you don't bring facts and you don't bring civility. You think yourself smart but upon seeing a leftist expressing feelings of disenfranchising with the party, you bashed him just to bash the party in general, instead of trying to enticing him to your side. You have failed in every possible regard.Maokunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15459710218366288832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-33232564837039636612017-03-10T03:04:01.098-05:002017-03-10T03:04:01.098-05:00Civil discussion starts with facts. When facts ar...Civil discussion starts with facts. When facts are ignored, I stop being civil.<br /><br />The left platform created the inner cities. There isn't a single right wing city in america with a slum like atlanta, detroit, dc, and on and on.<br /><br />Now, the left is bringing violence out of their own territory and projecting it against red people, and you say it's "inevitable." For what it's worth, antifa are a bunch of rich, spoiled brats, without jobs. They are not the 'truly' suffering. <br /><br />You're just making excuses for leftists to attack right wingers, and complaining when the thugs you've unleashed attack you verbally for eating bananas. Their violence is just as arbitrary against the right as against the left.<br /><br />These are the base facts. You say you want civil discussion, except that the right is being physically attacked. Restrain your own party, or you will find that we will restrain it for you.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-5989945051080795212017-03-10T01:30:08.040-05:002017-03-10T01:30:08.040-05:00Mmm. You were also rather unnecessarily nasty abou...Mmm. You were also rather unnecessarily nasty about it. I've been less inclined to weigh and respond to your points than to say U MAD BRO? and block you from commenting. (You'll notice I've done neither.)<br /><br />If you want to troll, fine. Whatever. Mission accomplished. But if you're actually looking to have fruitful discussions with people in other camps, it would be more productive to approach them with respect—or at least civility.<br /><br />Better luck next time.Patrick Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02410016566636603639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8972120889629675714.post-36789608281356685722017-03-10T01:07:41.232-05:002017-03-10T01:07:41.232-05:00I presented simple facts. Your argumentation is a...I presented simple facts. Your argumentation is all verbal sleight of hand, the more clever of which replaces the meanings of the words I've used, the less clever outright ignoring what I've said or putting words in my mouth.<br /><br />The modern left is essentially engaged in struggle sessions, where facts are ignored. You persecute your own for being insufficiently leftist, or insufficiently sorry. These attacks are unidirectionally pointed further right, and so extremity deepens with every passing month. Mao would be proud.fssafhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09591419983003748292noreply@blogger.com